Spot-On Graphics

Sequential Drawings: The New Yorker Series     Richard McGuire     (2016)

Although I have no credentials at all as an art critic, I’m recommending this art book to you. At my local library, it’s been classified as a “graphic novel,” and that designation is apt. This is highly accessible art, in the form of little drawings that appeared in the midst of text in The New Yorker magazine between the years 2005 and 2015. Artist Richard McGuire is one of many artists whose graphic work has been used to break up intimidating pages of words in the magazine.

You may not be familiar with the format of these drawings, called “spot illustrations” or “spots” or “vignettes.” Before the digital era, when the staff of print magazines were setting up pages of text, they often used spots to accompany stories or to fill space. Luc Sante, in his introduction to Sequential Drawings, tells us that “digital composition has largely eliminated the physical need for spots . . . The New Yorker’s spot is no longer a stopgap but an attraction in its own right.” The New Yorker has separate spots that illustrate the themes of individual articles, but the sequential spots, scattered throughout the magazine, are a different breed and are especially appealing to me.

Indeed, when I attack an issue of The New Yorker, I flip through the entire magazine looking solely at the sequential spots—trying hard not to look at the cartoons, which I save for later. In recent years, The New Yorker has assigned the spots for each issue to one artist, making the sequential aspect possible. Sequential spots are unrelated to the text around them, but rather riff on a theme or story all their own. In the January 23, 2017, issue, for example, all the sequential spots, by Tomi Um, showed one or more persons in a protest march.

Richard McGuire has collected 29 of his sequences, including cover and front matter drawings, in this thick but tiny book. Each drawing has its own page, inviting pauses for inspection, but on my first pass through I couldn’t wait to turn the pages. Some of the sequences are collections—of wire in various shapes, of bird cages, of frozen things. Others have some level of narrative, either explicit (a harrowing ride in a “Taxi”) or implicit (a day in the life of a “Pigeon”).

Among my favorite sequences is “Scenes from a Table,” nine drawings of the four mainstays of tabletops in diners: ketchup, mustard, salt, and pepper. In one drawing, McGuire places a diner patron’s soggy teabag next to the pepper. In another, he shows the four main objects overpowered by the presence of a towering ice cream soda, complete with cherry and two straws. The four objects cower when coffee spills at their feet. In three of the spots, the ketchup bottle has its cap askew and slightly globbed; in another spot ol’ ketchup has pitiful drips down its side; in yet another it is standing upside down, presumably so that a patron can extract the last of its contents. In the final spot of this series, the four objects are partially reflected in a bowl of soup, doubling their authority.

In the sequence “Noise Upstairs,” a man reading quietly in his apartment is assaulted by various loud noises from the apartment above, depicted by giant shoes or giant mouths or giant record players. When the poor man finally gets up the courage to tap ever so lightly on his ceiling with a broom handle, he gets even more horrendous noise. The introduction to Sequential Drawings tells me that there are echoes of the German Expressionists in this sequence of drawings. That may be. I just see McGuire wordlessly but hilariously portraying the predicament of living below a boorish neighbor. 

Words cannot capture the magic of this book. I can see a case for buying it rather than borrowing it from the library. You could pass it around at a holiday gathering, to lure family members off their phones. And after everyone has had a chance to peruse the book, maybe you could carefully cut out a sequence of drawings and frame them.

This is a bonus Sunday post on the Cedar Park Blog.

Those New York Novels

The Ramblers     Aidan Donnelley Rowley (2016)

(plus brief notes on novels by Adelle Waldman and Cynthia D'Aprix Sweeney)

First, a sidebar.

Maybe I should stop reading these inbred New York City novels. Maybe only New Yorkers can sense where the satire starts. But I read a lot of fiction, and I’ve taught fiction to a lot of college students, so I should be able to discern satire, right? Even if I’m a Midwesterner?

I look back at a couple of other New York novels. I’m pretty certain that Adelle Waldman’s The Love Affairs of Nathaniel P. (2013) is sardonically mocking the callous, self-satisfied male New Yorkers who wreak havoc on the psyches of brilliant, sensitive female New Yorkers. Waldman’s view into this world is morbidly fascinating but morbid nonetheless.

Cynthia D’Aprix Sweeney’s The Nest (2016) is less clear on the satire front. Four siblings fight over their inheritance, which has been greatly depleted by a payout to cover up a crime by one of the brothers. Should I care about the quarrels of these disagreeable, money-grubbing characters, even if the plot is a tight one? Am I supposed to care, or am I supposed to recoil in horror?

This issue is not settled, but let’s move on to the main review.

The Ramblers, by Aidan Donnelley Rowley (2016), brings us three more New Yorkers who have too much money and too many drinks. Admittedly, Clio Marsh was born middle class, but she’s pulled herself up by the proverbial bootstraps to earn a PhD in ornithology. And she lives nearly rent-free as roommate to Smith Anderson, a daughter of the 1% who declutters the Manhattan apartments of her private clients. The third profiled character is Tate Pennington, who has accidentally made a fortune in the tech world and retired to New York to take street photographs and escape his estranged wife in California.

All three are in their mid-30s, yet they prate endlessly about their undergraduate days together at Yale and enter into petty squabbles about the relative advantages of Princeton. Really? So you’ve read Foucault. I’m not impressed, though I think that the author, herself a Yalie, expects her readers to be.

Because the three protagonists are in their mid-thirties, they all long to be in committed relationships. This is a standard feature of the modern New York novel, though it’s usually only the women or the gay men who crave a long-lasting, monogamous marriage. The entire plot of The Ramblers revolves around the achievement of perfect domestic partnerships, but I couldn’t feel much sympathy for these three privileged strivers. They’re stock characters in a flat drama. Clio worries that the revelation of her mother’s mental illness and suicide will derail her affair with a wealthy bachelor fifteen years her senior. Smith won’t distance herself from her malicious father, even though this creepy father browbeat her fiancé into breaking up with her. And Tate salves the wounds made by his unfaithful wife with excessive amounts of alcohol, but he still shoots stunning photos.

The dialogue of the thirty-something women in The Ramblers does have sparkle, but when I hit some scenes with older women or with men (older or not), I found myself stopped mid-page by the inaptness of tone and the cliché-ridden sentences. Wait, I thought, is the author satirizing this character? We’re back to that issue of inadvertent satire again.

If I’m so irritated by these self-aggrandizing characters and their $30 bottles of organic hair conditioner, why do I keep reading New York novels? Why did I ever get past page 50 of The Ramblers? Simple: I have a weakness for the New York part.

For instance, the title of The Ramblers refers to an area in Central Park called The Ramble, a semi-wild nature area in the middle of Manhattan, popular for those seeking outdoor gay sex, which has also become a favored site for birdwatchers. The character Clio leads public birding tours through The Ramble on Sunday mornings and gets written up in the local press. Tate, meanwhile, is a walking guide book to the poetic and architectural history of the city, seeking out the haunts of Stanley Kunitz and Dylan Thomas. Smith’s sister gets married in the cavernous, barrel-vaulted St. Bart’s Episcopal Church, with the reception at the ultra-glamorous Waldorf. The action of the novel takes place during the week of Thanksgiving, so the author can call up glorious late autumn days as well as the edge of silver-bell cheeriness for the upcoming Christmas season. In sum, the NYC of The Ramblers is more vividly portrayed than its inhabitants.

True, for heavy New York atmosphere, you can’t beat author Jay McInerney, and I’ve acknowledged this in a recent blog post reviewing his 2016 novel Bright, Precious Days. I detect satire in some of McInerney’s characters, but he fleshes them out so well and surrounds them with so much New York detail that I tumble right into their lives nonetheless.

And for a weekly dose of New York, I turn to the New Yorker. I can imagine myself at the openings of art exhibits and plays listed at the front and then settle in for some serious journalism, not necessarily about New York, by writers like Adam Gopnik, Joan Acocella, Jill Lepore, Hilton Als, Larissa MacFarquhar, Elizabeth Kolbert, Kalefa Sanneh, Jane Mayer, and Ryan Lizza. Gotta love it.